Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Diabetes ; 71, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1923961

ABSTRACT

Diabetes and pregnancy are independently associated with increased risk of severe COVID-infection. However, little is known about the relationship between severe COVID-and diabetes in pregnancy. We sought to determine whether diabetes in pregnancy was associated with increased risk of COVID-infection and severity. We conducted a case-control study of all delivering patients at a tertiary hospital from June 2020-September 2021 and accepted universal COVID-testing. Patients with no COVID-test results were excluded. The proportion of patients with any COVID-infection and severe COVID-infection during pregnancy were compared between patients with and without diabetes using chi-square. Severe COVID-was defined as meeting any WHOOSCI or NCPERET criteria (dyspnea, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per minute, blood oxygen saturation of ≤93%, PaO2/FiO2 <300, lung infiltrates involving >50% on imaging, non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen use, intubation and mechanical ventilation, or ventilation with additional organ support) . Of 4,253 patients in our analysis, 292 (6.9%) had COVID-during pregnancy. Demographic characteristics were similar between patients with a COVID-infection in pregnancy and those that were negative;71 (24.3%) had a severe infection, and 451 (10.6%) had diabetes. There was no difference between patients with and without diabetes in incidence of COVID-infection (9.6% vs. 10.7%, p=0.56) or severe COVID-infection (11.3% vs. 9%, p=0.58) . Diabetes in pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of COVID-infection or severe infection. Future research in larger samples may further elucidate the association between diabetes and COVID-infection in pregnancy.

2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 2(3): 100130, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064733

ABSTRACT

Because the obstetrical population seems to have a high proportion of asymptomatic patients who are carriers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, universal testing has been proposed as a strategy to risk-stratify all obstetrical admissions and guide infection prevention protocols. Here, we describe a case of a critically ill obstetrical patient with all the clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 and 3 false-negative results of nasopharyngeal swabs for molecular testing. We review and discuss the uncertain clinical characteristics of current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 molecular testing and the implications of false-negative results in the obstetrical population.


Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 , False Negative Reactions , Infection Control/methods , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cesarean Section/methods , Critical Care/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Adjustment/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL